© ATP Architekten und Ingenieure . Pubblicata il 01 Luglio 2009.
Innsbruck, 5th June 2009 – What is the meaning of Innsbruck and the Alps for teaching in the faculty and what is the relationship between these two disciplines – today and in the future?
© ATP Architekten und Ingenieure . Pubblicata il 01 Luglio 2009.
These are the basic issues addressed by the design team
from ATP sphere and ATP Architects and Engineers, Innsbruck.
Part of the answer is the way in which the general
approach – and in particular the retained grid – emphasises
the role of the campus as a place for students to come
together. A second key is the specificity with which the
project reacts to the needs of the varied activities and users
– manifested here in the clear differentiation between the
main buildings and the way in which they respond to their
student occupants.
The project externalises the differences between the disciplines
and the characteristics of the teaching approaches.
While the engineering tower offers a precise and identical
yet at the same time flexible set of spaces for around 30
separate institutes, the architecture building – in which
only around 5 institutes are located – is a hybrid: an open
plan building which seeks to establish its narrative in its
external appearance. The architecture building can be
seen as a laboratory cube. The open construction allows,
for example, the façade to become a display and learning
object which the students themselves can further develop
with their own work.
© ATP Architekten und Ingenieure . Pubblicata il 01 Luglio 2009.
Central Idea
The relaunch offers an opportunity for addressing fundamental
issues about the University of Innsbruck. What is
the meaning of Innsbruck and the Alps for teaching in the
faculty and what is the relationship between these two
disciplines – today and in the future?
The principal characteristic of the buildings today is their
extreme flexibility and the almost scholarly thoroughness
of the building grid. Yet between the exterior and the
interior of the building there is virtually no relationship.
There is little opportunity for coming together and the
notion of campus is non-existent in the concourse – which
is exactly where it could be at its strongest. The project
for relaunching the Innsbruck Faculty of Architecture and
Building aims to build upon existing concepts. Central to
the project is the creation of space for students to come
together in the form of a central shared circulation area
and central atrium (amphitheatre). Equally important is the
specificity with which the project reacts to the needs of
the varied activities and users of the main buildings. The
relaunch of these main buildings attempts to counteract
the uniformity of the complex by focusing specifically on
the individual disciplines and the context of the building.
© ATP Architekten und Ingenieure . Pubblicata il 01 Luglio 2009.
Concept
The relaunch readdresses this notion of the whole, while
allowing each element to retain its special character.
The engineering building is conceived as a precise and
elegant form with a detailed spatial structure which allows
the creation of individual, combined, group and open-plan
offices. The basic principles of the internal division are
retained.
The architecture building builds upon the earlier principle
of adaptability and the addition of a new element to the
existing balcony allows the creation of 20% more floor
space. The areas are finished with fair-faced concrete and
will be simply furnished. The two buildings act as before
as an ensemble but, by addressing the characteristics of
the various users, additional identifying elements for the
two disciplines have been created.
These different approaches in the upper floors are partly
drawn together in the ground floors and, in particular, in
the basement areas of the two buildings. The ground
floors will operate in future as pure seminar areas. They
are transparent – as a shop window for the educational
activities within – and the basement levels further develop
the strategy established in the architecture building.
This new level is reached by means of an atrium whose
form is developed out of the canteen and library elements
and it is here that all common activities are located. It
is an informal setting for meetings and the areas newly
created here allow the upper levels to be reorganised.
The westward development of the new basement level
also allows the new canteen and library elements to be
incorporated at this level. The clear separation of shared
activities, seminar level and specific institute areas at
the upper levels represents a major improvement in the
functionality of the whole. Circulation within the complex
is also much simpler.
© ATP Architekten und Ingenieure . Pubblicata il 01 Luglio 2009.
Relationships and Connections on the Scale of
the City
The new campus is demonstrably oriented towards the
public sphere – and in particular southwards towards the
streetscape of the Kranebitter Allee, where public transport
connections are located. The reworking of the basement
level in particular also improves the integration of the
complex into the cycle path network – and hence into the
surroundings in general.
The markedly tower-like treatment of the engineering building
gives it a landmark character whereas the cantilevered
“shop-window for learning” of the architecture building at
ground fl oor level binds the complex to the street and acts
as an entrance element.
The focus of the new organisation of the faculty is the atrium.
This opens onto a new circulation level which groups communal
student activities. The ground fl oor contains seminar
and lecture rooms as well as drawing studios. Above this
level are clearly arranged the specialised institutes of the
two branches of the faculty which are conceived to promote
undisturbed learning. The enlargement of the architecture
faculty allows institutes which are currently located elsewhere
(construction and design/architectural theory) to
return to the building and also provides space for possible
future new institutes (such as master classes, etc).
© ATP Architekten und Ingenieure . Pubblicata il 01 Luglio 2009.
Competition Design: ATP Architects and Engineers (ATP sphere and ATP Innsbruck)
© ATP Architekten und Ingenieure . Pubblicata il 01 Luglio 2009.
Competition Team: Christoph Achammer, Marc Eutebach, Robert Kelca, Klaus Hessenberger, Caroline Winkler, Paul Ohnmacht, Linus Stolz, Hubert Neuhauser, Peter Oberhuber, Klaus Gebhart
Europaconcorsi cura il servizio di informazione sui bandi di progettazione e la realizzazione del servizio albo-on-line delle seguenti associazioni professionali:
Ordine Architetti: Agrigento, Alessandria, Ancona, Aosta, Arezzo, Ascoli Piceno, Asti, Avellino, Bari, Belluno, Benevento, Bergamo, Biella, Bologna, Bolzano, Brescia, Brindisi, Caserta, Catania, Catanzaro, Como, Cremona, Cuneo, Fermo, Ferrara, Foggia, Forlì - Cesena, Genova, Gorizia, Grosseto, Imperia, La Spezia, Lecce, Lecco, Livorno, Lodi, Macerata, Mantova, Massa Carrara, Matera, Messina, Milano, Monza, Napoli, Novara, Nuoro, Oristano, Palermo, Pavia, Perugia, Pescara, Piacenza, Pisa, Pistoia, Pordenone, Potenza, Ragusa, Reggio Calabria, Reggio Emilia, Rimini, Salerno, Sassari, Siena, Siracusa, Sondrio, Taranto, Teramo, Terni, Torino, Trapani, Trento, Treviso, Trieste, Udine, Varese, Venezia, Vercelli, Verona, Vibo Valentia, Vicenza
Ordine Ingegneri: Ascoli Piceno, Bari, Cagliari, Foggia, L'Aquila, Lecce, Lecco, Messina, Monza, Padova, Palermo, Pavia, Perugia, Potenza, Prato, Reggio Calabria, Rimini, Salerno, Sassari, Teramo, Torino, Trento, Treviso, Varese, Vercelli, Roma
Collegio Ingegneri della Toscana, Collegio dei Periti Industriali di Grosseto, Federazione agronomi e forestali della Lombardia, Dipartimento S.S.A.R. Università "G. D'Annunzio", Collegio Geometri Reggio Calabria, Consiglio Nazionale dei Geologi, InArSind Sindacato Nazionale Ingegneri e Architetti, Ordine Ingegneri e Architetti di San Marino, Collegio dei Periti Industriali di Siena, Associazione Laureati Iuav
Vedi la lista di tutte le associazioni per regione. Per maggiori informazioni Contattateci